Home
Gender Bias Learning Project
For Academics
Gender Bias in Academia
The Economics of Retaining Women
Effective Practices to Retain Women
Heads Up!
Blog: Share Your Stories
Reading List

Offer a Part-Time Tenure Track Alternative

Issue
The rigidity of the tenure clock, when combined with the 50+ hour workweek typical of academics, disproportionately bars mothers from succeeding in academia—and dissuades many women from pursuing an academic career in the first place.[1] The rigid, one-size-fits-all career track is one reason that married women, both with and without children, are leaving academia at disproportionately high rates at every stage of the academic career.[2] In addition, when the University of California surveyed their faculty, they found significant interest in a part-time tenure track not only from women, but also from men.[3] 91% of women and 84% of men indicated that they are “very supportive” or “somewhat supportive” of a flexible part-time option with pro-rated career timelines and parity.[4]

Faculty who opt for a part-time tenure track should be able to decide when the time is right to return to a full-time tenure track. It is also important that the administrative decision making on part-time tenure track be centralized (at the level of the provost or dean) to ensure an equitable approval process.

1Temporary and Permanent Part-Time Tenure Track
The University of Washington has two policy options for tenure-track faculty who want to work part time: 1) a permanent part-time tenure track, and 2) a temporary part-time option, using partial leave and tenure-clock extensions.[5]
 
Part-Time Tenure Track
The University of California, Berkeley, also has instituted a part-time tenure track. It found in a survey of UC faculty that a majority of men, as well as women, supported this option, especially if it could be taken at any time during a career.[6]  

< previous section

back to index

next section >


Visit the UC Hastings College of the Law

© 2002-2010 The Center for WorkLife Law
http://www.worklifelaw.org

 


 

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0545422.
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.